The Madness of Roland is an early example of interactive and branching narrative. It is written with multiple perspectives of a single event. For reference it can be found at http://www.hyperbole.com/full/serial/roland/roland.html
To start, The Madness of Roland looks and feels very dated. Its navigation and styling makes understanding and following the story very difficult.
Beyond its organization and technological shortcomings lies a relatively engaging story. What is interesting is that while the different characters use the Siege of Paris as a background for their narrative, the story arc is focused solely on the character of Roland.
The Madness of Roland’s greatest strength is also its greatest weakness. Each story, or perspective of the story, has a very unique feel that is in many ways in direct opposition to other accounts. Normally the fresh perspectives would improve the dynamic story, however the different accounts lack adequate introduction which can confuse the reader. Without knowing the setting for the account, the characters involved, or the time frame; connecting the ideas from one account to another can be difficult.
The Madness of Roland uses good language and strong dialogue. The individual stories themselves not only provide a different account of the Roland character, but the manner in which each account is delivered literary unique. The first account is given by a minor character who narrates his interaction with the major character Mandricardo. This is in a way a second-hand account because the perspective is Mandricardo’s viewpoint, but it is chronicled by his companion. Roland gives his side of the story in a narrative form as though he is retelling the account to someone or logging it in a journal. It’s clarity and insightful nature provide a completely different view of Roland’s character than all other accounts. Charlemagne’s fevered and rambling account gives small pieces of background while maintaining the focus on Roland. The account from Angelica was given as a stream of conciseness narration of a very brief event.
Separate perspectives give an understanding of not only Roland’s character, but of the mindset and personality of each person giving an account. Readers can recognize different biases and irregularities from each character and it will facilitate the formation of a clearer understanding of the Siege of Paris and Roland’s involvement.
The Madness of Roland has strong writing and a good foundation for branching narrative. However its obsolete and troubled system of delivery (and acting) make enjoying the story more difficult than necessary.